![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||||
| Sign up here to receive BioCycle electronic bulletin. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Home |
BioCycle WorldBioCycle September 2005, Vol. 46, No. 9, p. 6 DEVELOPING A PROTOCOL FOR ALLEGED biosolids land application and health effects exists,” notes the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), which is soliciting proposals from researchers. According to WERF, this research responds to a July 2002 report from the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. Although the report found no documented scientific evidence that the part 503 rules have failed to protect public health, it did recommend that U.S. EPA update the scientific basis of regulations governing biosolids, improve knowledge of chemicals and, pathogens, and evaluate concerns about health effects and exposure. The WERF funding for Phase 1 of this program is $150,000. The complete research program includes development of a protocol (Phase 1), the pilot testing and refinement of the protocol (Phase 2), and a methodology for its implementation and use by the appropriate agencies (Phase 3). The funding amounts for Phases 2 and 3 will be established while Phase 1 is underway. For more information - about this WERF research, visit www.werf.org or contact Elizabeth Striano via e-mail at estriano@werf.org. Proposals should be submitted to WERF by October 3, 2005.
According to a report in LEISA, the magazine which reports Low External Input and Sustainable Agriculture progress (Vol. 21, No. 1), about 50 to 60 percent of the farmers who established biogas plants have been successful and “... are happy with the technology, especially in highly populated districts where fuel wood is a major problem. They save the money that would otherwise have been used to buy fertilizer and they save the time used to make compost, as the slurry needs no treatment before use.” Website for LEISA is www.leisa.info.
The response from landscapers showed a strong interest in green waste compost; last year, over 875,000 cubic meters of compost were used. Writes O'Brien: “Over the next two to three years, both supply and demand are predicted to increase significantly, with annual demand for composted products expected to increase to 926,000 m3 by 2007 and demand for organic matter as a whole expected to rise to over 3.5 million m3 in the next three years.” Costs are seen as a continuing challenge; WRAP reports that green waste compost is around £15 ($27) per cubic meter. Overall findings indicate strong and continued growth in demand for compost, with these areas “representing specific opportunities”: topsoil amelioration; topsoil manufacture; topdressing; and mulching. In the horticulture industry, a major barrier to widespread acceptable is a negative perception of compost quality. Specifically pathogens were viewed as a “major limitation to increased uptake of composted materials by producers.” A WRAP study on pathogens showed that a composting process that treats green waste at a minimum of 65°C for seven days, with minimum moisture of 51 percent will eradicate all major pathogens. In the organic farming marketplace, WRAP found that the demand for green waste compost appears to have reduced slightly over 2004, but product sales were estimated at £126,898 ($228,416). Looking ahead, O'Brien points out that if the amount of fully organic land increases, compost use “is likely to increase. However, the total amount of organically managed land in the U.K. has declined over the last year, and it is not clear whether or not that decline will continue.” On the positive side, she cites growing government pressure on the horticulture industry to use more peat free products. Also the growing emphasis on urban regeneration, brownfield development and land remediation have presented compost with a new-and significant role. Finally, she emphasizes, “WRAP is committed to creating sustainable markets for composted products and encourages everyone to join the revolution.”
In an article titled “Worming into New Territory” in Wisconsin Natural Resources, Sophia Estante reports that scientists are finding that earthworms (like other exotic species) may negatively change the environment. She also quotes a University of Montana doctoral candidate who explains that earthworms alter plant communities by Gardeners are urged to be careful when transplanting: “People should only introduce worms to planting where worms are already present, or in compost piles where the worms will not survive outside the pile.” Estante also notes that more than 100 earthworm species have been identified, and 15 species are commonly found in the Midwest and Canada - some living in the leaf litter layer and others dwelling in the top soil layers, while night crawlers burrow deep into subsoil layers. To learn more about earthworms, and a project called Worm Watch, she suggests a website visit to: www.nrri.umn.edu/worms. And for more details about Wisconsin Natural Resources, call 608-267-7410. Cindy Hale is a forest ecologist at the University of Minnesota-Duluth who studies how different species of earthworms may change soil structure. Her work is also described in the magazine article. She can be contacted at the Natural Resources Research Institute, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, Minnesota 55811.
A report in the Department of Energy's Biomass Initiative for August 2005 shows that the state of Utah consumed 833.1 trillion Btu of energy, with coal supplying nearly half of that amount. Petroleum and natural gas accounted for 31 and 20 percent respectively. It is estimated that Utah could generate 1.1 billion kWh of electricity from biomass sources, which could power 105,000 homes (or 19 percent of all residential needs in the state.) Urban and agricultural residues account for the most potential energy at 231,000 and 217,000 dry tons/year respectively. Annually, forest residues can contribute 173,000 dry tons, and 102,000 dry tons are available from mill residues. At Utah State University, a recent grant from the U.S. DOE will be used to demonstrate an anaerobic digester system at a large dairy farm. Two projects will be using landfill gases to convert into usable energy. The first project is a methane gas to energy located at the Salt Lake City landfill, with chief partner Detroit Edison; the second project is at the Hill Air Force Base building a new power plant using methane gas from the Davis County landfill to save $600,000 per year on energy costs. Current biomass operations in Utah include the Davis County SWM and Energy Recovery, which converts municipal solid wastes to energy and the Garkane Power Association which uses milling and logging residues to produce energy. The two biomass installations have a combined output of 5,600 kW. The state of Utah offers tax breaks for biomass, and other renewable systems, such as a sales tax exemption on the purchase of industrial systems with outputs of 20 kW or greater and tax credits (25 percent for residential systems, and 10 percent for commercial installations.) The private company Mainstay Energy also offers to buy renewable energy credits from owners of renewable energy systems.
Chicago mayor Richard Daley became a strong advocate for green roofs of live plants while traveling in Europe. Now 120 will be built including one on City Hall and one above a huge subterranean parking garage and commuter train terminal in Millennium Park. As explained in BioCycle articles, green roofs reduce sewer overflows by absorbing rain (especially when compost is used) filter out pollutants, oxygenate the air, and keep buildings cooler in summer while cutting electricity use. In New York City, landscapers last month were installing a green roof (covering 35,000 sq ft) at the Silvercup Studios where parts of the HBO series, “The Sopranos,” are filmed. Proponents hope that the project data will convin commercial property owners and developers to use the concept widely. “We are looking to demonstrate to the government, the public and private business that green technologies are an economic benefit,”said the co-owner of Silvercup Studios. The project obtained a major grant from Clean Air Communities which is devoted to reducing air pollution and energy consumption in low-income neighborhoods. With current technology, green roofs typically cost $8 to $10 a square foot, while a regular roof costs about $4 to $8. New York City has approximately 60,000 sq ft of green roofs built or under construction. Other green roof examples in North America include: a 1.5 acre installation at the Gap corporate office in San Bruno, California; an 8-acre multilevel roof on Salt Lake City's Latter Day Saints Conference Center; a 10.4 acre roof on the Ford Motor Company's truck plant in Dearborn, Michigan; and a green roof planned for the remodeled California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park. Copyright 2005, The JG Press, Inc. |
Subscribe
|
|||||||||||||||||
| SEARCH ARTICLE ARCHIVES | BIOCYCLE | IN BUSINESS | COMPOST SCIENCE | CONFERENCES | BOOKS | SUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE | LINKS | CONTACT US | ABOUT US | HOME findacomposter.com www.jgpress.com Copyright & Trademark Notice |